Blake strives to be a pluralistic community, representative of many different perspectives. Yet, its community seems to not be able to have conversations fully inclusive of all opinions. While conversations about this lack of differing viewpoints aren’t uncommon, it’s a topic that, despite being critical of the community, the community continues to be interested in. 

      While Blake strives in many areas for diversity that mirrors the diversity of its surrounding areas, it does not contain the same ideological diversity. In this, Blake creates a bubble that separates its community from the general population. This is noticeable, as while constructive conversations about varying political topics  are encouraged, they often result in a singular perspective being echoed. Furthermore, as non-popular, but not harmful, views are shared, the community does not produce an ideologically diverse conversation. This isn’t a reflection of the students abilities to have a more nuanced discussion, rather it’s exemplary of the culture at Blake. This culture, revolving around particular political perspective being clearly seen as popular, leads to people feeling that they may not be fully accepted if they share their opinion that they know to be less popular. This further contributes to this cycle of popular and unpopular opinions, which creates an environment at Blake that to many, feels like a bubble compared to other communities.